The Brat's Preamble About Himself: As
several guys can (Ron) attest, Bratting out is not a new thing. I've done
it my whole life. I suppose it shouldn't come as a surprise that I acted childish when I was actually a child. There's one especially memorable Brat-out session I
can recall from sometime when I was elementary school age. I was in a
hotel room during an AAU weekend complaining to my old man about my
lack of minutes (despite my team winning.) My dad (the infamous DC)
told me something then that is so simple but so often overlooked at
every level of sports. By no means a pearl of wisdom from my dad but
something that for whatever reason has always stuck with me. That is,
for me to go in the game, someone has to come out of the game. In
other words, it can make perfect sense that I should be
playing more but it also has to make perfect sense that someone else
should be playing less.
How
does this apply to PCTI? Even though some of my numbers seem to point
to a player that is better than seventh, you'd have a hard time
arguing that one of the six higher rated players should move down the
list below me.
There's
also several factors working against me.
-I run
funny. I look funny standing around. There's nothing I do that looks
even vaguely athletic. Deep down there's probably a lot of people
that feel like if they tried like I do they could consistently put up
11 and 7...and if they were 6-4 and left handed? They could do it in
their sleep.
-At
one point or another, I've picked apart everyone else's game. And
really, who am I to talk?
-I'm
consistently a high draft pick for reasons difficult to explain.
-As
much as we joke, the Brat-outs often are incredibly annoying.
This
next paragraph is important: I'm not saying any of this looking for a
love fest to breakout in the comments section. I'm not fishing for
compliments. As I've demonstrated before, I have no problem pointing
out the good parts of my game. In fact, I probably do it more
naturally than anyone else in PCTI and I'll do enough of it in the
writing that follows. So don't worry, my sense of self worth is just fine.
Voting Breakdown: highest vote: 3,
lowest vote: 15. Fifteen definitely stings but I know I've got my
fair share of detractors. In fact, I was a little surprised I didn't
register more in the overrated vote, considering the reasons I listed previously.
Lifetime PCTI Record: 2-2, captained a winning squad in PCTI II and on the right side of the KD
Lifetime Stats: 10.7 ppg (5th),
7.2 rpg (2nd, pretty good battle between Skillz and me for
top rebounder. I have more lifetime boards but because he missed a
few games when he got his face smashed, he narrowly has the better
average), 9 steals (T-12 with Bruiser), 18 blocks (1st),
54 assists (5th), 45.7 percent shooting (2nd),
24.1 percent from three (13th, oooouch) and the
all-important Sabin Productivity number: 231 (2nd)
Lifetime Bests: 26 points (multiple
times), 14 rebounds (PCTI I, game 3), 5 assists (multiple times)
Other Notes: I had a monstrous PCTI I.
When they create a PCTI Hall of Fame they'll have to build a separate
wing for my stats from the second session pf PCTI I: 26 and 14
followed up by 26 and 10, 18-27 shooting and six assists. The problem
for me is, since then the hall of fame performances have been few and
far between and PCTI I was eons ago. I've been solid since then
but few things about what I've done have stood out as elite.
The most pleasant surprise looking back
at my PCTIs: I have pretty good assist numbers. Kinda surprising
since the game is rarely “played through me.” (Although I have a
very pedestrian 1.4 a/t) The most troubling stat: the inability to
make a three pointer. I go from (arguably) PCTI's best garbage guy to
an actual game changer if I can make a jumper, it opens up other
things (read: straight line lefty drives) for me if my defender feels the need to contest my jumper.
As for superlatives, I barely was a
factor. I was pretty surprised I didn't figure higher in the
overrated (2 votes) or playing above his ability (1 vote) categories considering my ranking. Someone is especially fond of a Brat-out and voted me as the guy he
most likes to see lose. Lastly, chalk up a vote for best looking. (←
thanks Beas)
You also failed to mention that you can't guard me or DK (and vice versa) due to the inevitable over-aggression by all parties involved.
ReplyDeleteVery good critique of yourself, which I definitely couldn't do (I would only pick on the great stuff that I do, which is flop). As the person I know the best and longest in this thing, it goes without saying that BC is my favorite person to play with. Always seems to know where I am on both ends of the floor and the one person I know that can play "help-side" defense in this thing (Bontrager>King). Also, you leading in blocks is not shocking but also funny considering your "deceptive length" is actually normal for your size (6'4 height/6'4 wingspan).
Regardless of how the rest of these rankings shake out, I fully expect all of the "12" to be playing for not only the coveted PCTI ring, but also for pride. This may be the most competitive PCTI to date.
Of course, I could be wrong. Does anyone else get heartburn at age 29? Me too!
How did you know?
ReplyDeleteSafest pick in the draft 5 years running.
ReplyDeleteI'm probably guilty of being a BC apologist and that's fine by me. And maybe my support of this guy has something to do with the fact that he is one of my guys in this tournament. So I'm tryna tell you I'm biased toward the Temperamental Lefty.
ReplyDeleteBut the thought I keep coming back to is this....you can do so much worse than a consistent 12 and 7 guy who is in great condition, gives a crap, and helps his team on both ends. Add in the fact that he shoots a really high percentage compared to his PCTI brethren and you are left with an efficient, high-motor, and productive player and teammate. I ask facetiously....what is wrong with that?
There are some who will pick nits that he can only go left like Zoolander, and others who might say he's not efficient when he puts his head down to penetrate. Sure, we all have parts of our games that seem underwhelming to our counter-parts. But on balance, the good this guy brings to the table is overwhelmingly positive versus the minor items that he gets criticized for. I'm surprised to see him at 7 since his production points to a top 5 ranking. What's more, his Sabin productivity metric is #2 and you all know I put a lot of stock in that category. I can't help but think that some players get caught up in evaluating him stylistically instead of based on production. Because if it just about production, then there is no argument that extends him beyond the top 5.